Holiday Shop


WGBH Radio WGBH Radio theclassicalstation.org

Joubert: Symphony No 2; Alwyn: The Fairy Fiddler; Martelli: Symphony / Yates

Joubert / Yates
Release Date: 09/13/2011 
Label:  Dutton Laboratories/Vocalion   Catalog #: 7270   Spars Code: DDD 
Composer:  John JoubertWilliam AlwynCarlo Martelli
Conductor:  Martin Yates
Orchestra/Ensemble:  Royal Scottish National Orchestra
Number of Discs: 1 
Recorded in: Stereo 
In Stock: Usually ships in 24 hours.  
On sale! $25.98
CD:  $21.99
In Stock



Notes and Editorial Reviews



JOUBERT Symphony No. 2. ALWYN The Fairy Fiddler: Prelude; Derrybeg Fair. MARTELLI Symphony No. 2 Martin Yates, cond; Royal Scottish SO DUTTON 7270 (71:10)


Recently I reviewed John Joubert’s Symphony No. 1 ( Fanfare 34: 3), a fine work from 1956 in the British Read more neoclassical style, in debt to the likes of Holst and Hindemith for its combination of lyrical impulse and taut athleticism. Now we have the composer’s Symphony No. 2, from 1970. Subtitled “In Memory of Those Killed at Sharpeville,” it aimed to memorialize the people shot by South African police during a demonstration against the infamous pass laws—the law that required all blacks to carry and produce pass books whenever demanded by any white. Joubert’s interest in the nation was understandable. Of South African descent, he received both his general education in that country, and later musical composition with that admirable educator and fine composer William Henry Bell. According to Joubert, the first performance was heavily reported by the South African press, after which he was informed by the then-head of music at the government-controlled South African Broadcasting Corporation that the symphony would never be played there. In 1994 it was, after Nelson Mandela himself assisted in securing its performance.


Joubert, by his own admission, came strongly under the influence of Shostakovich in the intervening years between his first two symphonies—though the evidence of the Second Symphony suggests this was a matter of adding additional procedures and expressive elements within the composer’s already prominent lyrical gifts, rather than turning him into a copy of the Soviet musician. The work’s first, slower section explores tensions induced by counterpoint treatment of a chromatic theme over a double-bass ostinato figure, from C?/D? to C. A repeated-note theme appears in the faster, more tumultuous second section, though the references back to the beginning and the unique structural approach as a whole give the work the feeling of a Rubbra-like fantasia. The orchestral writing displays great sensitivity, and there’s a luminous quality to its moments of repose, however brief.


Between the symphonies of Joubert and Carlo Martelli, Martin Yates has placed two interludes by William Alwyn. They date from the mid 1920s, when he was working on his first opera, The Fairy Fiddler , using an Irish folk-inflected libretto by the poet Gertrude Hind. The Cambridge University Library states that most of what he wrote for it is now lost, although “the overture, the libretto, and an abridged vocal score survive.” That the act I prelude (rather than an overture) and the Derrybeg Fair still exist and are now recorded is cause for some celebration, as Alwyn attempted to destroy as many of his early manuscripts as possible. At nearly 10 minutes in this performance, the prelude amounts to a contemplative tone poem that expresses the despair of Terry, the title’s fiddler who has lost the inspiration to play, and the fairies that will help him counter the spells of the evil Witch of Roona. Derrybeg Fair (effectively a prelude to the opera’s last scene) leads off with a robust gig, but includes a warmly lyrical central section for Terry’s violin that owes more to Delius than to O’Carolan.


Martelli (b.1935) was considered among the most promising young composers of the 1950s. However, his career and music were sidelined by policy changes only a few years later, when the musical management of the BBC decided to promote the Darmstadt School sanctioned by that high priest of avant-garde orthodoxy, Boulez, while ignoring traditionally composed fare. As the network was the single greatest source of promotion for British composers, this effectively put paid to Martelli’s compositional career at its outset. A heavy schedule of subsequent film composition and an accident involving the loss of all his unpublished manuscripts in the early 1970s extended his period of invisibility before the public, though in recent years he’s begun writing again.


Martelli composed his Symphony No. 2 at the ripe age of 19. The third movement—longer than the other two put together—was the entire original work, until Malcolm Arnold reviewed the score and suggested two further movements for balance. Shostakovich is very much present in the musical language, and Nielsen in the second movement, but the personality of the composer is distinct. There is an almost casual confidence about the Second Symphony’s first two movements despite the tension of the first; a radiant testing of strength that finds nothing wanting. The lengthy and ambitious third movement overreaches, but not enough to obscure the very real achievements of this work.


Yates has an ear for a score’s color, and in the Royal Scottish musicians he has an ensemble capable of reflecting this attention. The Fairy Fiddler pieces in particular benefit from immersion in Alwyn’s sound world, while the opening section to Joubert’s Second Symphony gains as well from a focus on pulse and clarity of line. There’s great energy in the second section of the work, though less incisiveness than I would like to hear, given the pain of the subject matter, inherent as well in its musical treatment. The best thing here is the especially nuanced performance given to Martelli’s scherzo, with notable attention to the weight of its quicksilver shifts in instrumentation and expressive gesture.


With excellent engineering, there’s reason to hand out applause all around. Can we hope as well that Dutton and Yates may be turning their attention to further music by Martelli?


FANFARE: Barry Brenesal


I have never heard any symphonic or orchestral works by Cape Town born John Joubert prior to listening to this present CD. Typically - I am ashamed to say this - I have tended to associate this composer with Christmas Carols: ‘Torches’ was one of the works that the Senior Ensemble struggled with at Coatbridge High School. Yet a glance at the composer’s web pages reveals a large number of works in a wide variety of genres and styles. For example, beside the two symphonies, there are concertos for bassoon, violin, piano and oboe. There are also important essays for chamber ensemble, piano, organ and the stage. To be sure, a large part of his output is dedicated to choral music – both accompanied by orchestra and a cappella. Amongst these works are the two carols upon which much of Joubert’s prestige rests. Interestingly, there are some fourteen recordings of ‘There is no Rose’ and eleven of the aforementioned ‘Torches’. The First Symphony can be heard on Lyrita.

However, these two choral gems cannot prepare the listener for the experience of listening to the Symphony No. 2 in one movement, Op.68 (In memory of those killed at Sharpeville 21/3/60).

I do not want to get into a debate about the use political characters or historical events as ‘inspiration’ for major works of art. However, there are certain events that do seem to have a universal significance and are reflected in a number of musical works. One thinks of Penderecki’s Threnody for the victims of Hiroshima, Benjamin Frankel’s Violin Concerto ‘In memory of the Six Million’ (who died in the Holocaust) and, perhaps, Richard Arnell’s ‘Mandela’ Symphony.

There may be a danger of ascribing a work to some event or personage in respect of which subsequent opinion takes a less-positive view. One needs only think of music dedicated to, or lionising the achievements of, Lenin: for example the Symphony No. 3 in B flat minor, Op. 22 ‘Requiem for Lenin’ by Dmitri Kabalevsky.

However, the vast majority of people will accept that the massacre at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960 was totally unacceptable and wrong by any standards of civilised behaviour. Whatever evils were perpetrated subsequently by the various participants in the struggle against apartheid, Sharpeville is seen as an icon of the ‘iniquities of a policy of racial segregation’. The present Symphony seeks to explore ‘some of the tensions brought about by [that] apartheid.’

The Symphony is not an easy or pleasant listening experience; however this goes with the political intention of the work. The music is often grinding or turgid, no doubt reflecting the nature of events. Violence is the keynote of much of this work: there is very little light and virtually nothing that can be described as being optimistic. There is a tiny moment of repose about four minutes from the end however the closing pages end aggressively. Joubert writes that he has used three African song melodies to give the work ‘a sense of urgency and immediacy of purpose, however it is difficult for the listener to known where this material begins and ends and where the composer’s own melodic invention comes to the fore.

I am not sure that I enjoyed this disturbing music - if enjoyment is something one does with a piece of this kind - and it is not a work that I will turn to often. To be sure, it is an impressive essay in organisation of material and instrumentation: there are plenty of interesting passages and the listener is never bored. Yet, it is music that is totally angst-ridden, and is singularly bound up with an historical event that has now passed into history, important and horrifying as it was. The Symphony was given its first performance at the Royal Festival Hall in 1971 with the composer conducting.

In 1985 I acquired a copy of the Stewart Craggs’ and Alan Poulton’s catalogue of William Alwyn’s music. This was before the days of the Chandos and Naxos cycles of the composer’s works. At that time there were only a handful of Lyrita LPs of the symphonies, a song-cycle or two and the Derby Day Overture. On turning to the ‘orchestral’ section of that book I was overwhelmed by the number of works that had not been recorded: I believed then that most never would be. Furthermore, a generally accepted axiom at that time stated that Alwyn had destroyed virtually every work written prior to the Rhapsody for String Quartet of 1939. I remember spotting the first two works in the catalogue: Derrybeg Fair and the ‘Prelude’ from the opera The Fairy Fiddler. The entries suggested that the editors had been ‘unable to trace’ the manuscripts. The Fairy Fiddler was the first attempt that William Alwyn made at writing a ‘stage-work’: it was composed between 1924 and 1926 when the composer was in his late teens. The work was never quite finished. In fact, the present pieces would appear to be the only extracts that came near to completion.

Andrew Knowles has provided a short synopsis of the opera plot: - ‘Terry, the Fiddler has lost his art of playing, and Clodagh, whom he loves, has been stricken dumb by the evil machinations of the Witch of Roona. The fairies come to their aid, and by a magic spell Terry gives his voice to Clodagh, and though dumb himself now, is able to play on his fiddle again.’ Not a profound scheme perhaps, but a good, satisfying fairy tale with a ‘happy-ish’ ending. The libretto was written by the Irish poet and dramatist Gertrude Hind (1877-1951).

The music for the Prelude is a minor masterpiece. It can be listened to as a ‘tone-poem’ without having to read into it a programme derived from the opera. It is a truly beautiful work that shows considerable promise and invention. Derrybeg Fair is a prelude to the last scene of the opera and describes a typically lively Irish fair in County Donegal. The work is in ternary form with vigorous music opening and closing the extract. However the middle section, which introduces the lovers’ theme, is bewitching. Interestingly, the Derrybeg Fair music was performed as a standalone work in 1926 and then again in 1936. I guess it has lain dormant since then.

Let us hope that Dutton Epoch or Naxos choose to record the last, few orchestral works in the catalogue that remain unheard.

Apart from a few pieces of ‘light’ music such as Persiflage, the Jubilee March, Promenade and others (Dutton), I have never heard any significant work by Carlo Martelli. This present Symphony is certainly an eye-opener and is in a totally different league to these more ephemeral pieces – at least from the point of view emotional power, concentration and architecture.

There are four things that need to be said about this fine Symphony. Firstly, although it may not be the greatest example of the genre from its era, it is a fine, important work that is both challenging and interesting and compares favourably with symphonies by Frankel, Searle and Gardner. Secondly, one needs to bear in mind that at the time the composer was only 19 years old and was still studying at the Royal College of Music. Although there is nothing precocious about this music, it is a superb early work of which any composer would and should be immensely proud. There is much here that is original, in spite of some nods to Shostakovich and other contemporary figures. Thirdly, the quality of the instrumentation shows great skill and imagination – much of the score is unsettling but the use of colour and texture is satisfying. Finally, it is hard to believe that a work which showed such promise has been virtually ignored for over half a century. I know that this has affected many symphonies by British composers from this era, but in Martelli’s case it is especially unfortunate as the work was initially widely fêted and was then forgotten.

Typically, the liner-notes by John Joubert and Andrew Knowles (Alwyn) are excellent. Carlo Martelli has given a succinct précis of his symphony but a little more detail would have been useful. However, it is helpful to have included ‘The Times’ review of the premiere at the Royal Festival Hall. I guess that not too many people will be familiar with the life and works of Mr. Martelli so a little bit more biographical detail may have been helpful. I know that there is a very good essay on MusicWeb International, but this dates from some 13 years ago.

Needless to say, the sound quality is excellent for all four works and the Royal Scottish National Orchestra and their conductor Martin Yates take all these works to heart and give convincing and satisfying performances.

This is an essential purchase for all fans of the ever-increasing number of British Symphonies available on CD and Alwyn enthusiasts who have been so well served over the past 20 years. These two groups will be hugely excited by this important new release from Dutton Epoch.

-- John France, MusicWeb International
Read less

Works on This Recording

1.
Symphony no 2, Op. 68 "In memory of those killed at Sharpeville, 21.3.60" by John Joubert
Conductor:  Martin Yates
Orchestra/Ensemble:  Royal Scottish National Orchestra
Period: 20th Century 
Written: 1970 
2.
The Fairy Fiddler: Prelude by William Alwyn
Conductor:  Martin Yates
Orchestra/Ensemble:  Royal Scottish National Orchestra
Period: 20th Century 
Written: 1924 
3.
The Fairy Fiddler: Derrybeg Fair by William Alwyn
Conductor:  Martin Yates
Orchestra/Ensemble:  Royal Scottish National Orchestra
Period: 20th Century 
Written: 1924 
4.
Symphony, Op. 4 by Carlo Martelli
Conductor:  Martin Yates
Orchestra/Ensemble:  Royal Scottish National Orchestra
Period: 20th Century 
Written: 1955-1956 

Customer Reviews

Be the first to review this title
Review This Title
Review This Title Share on Facebook




YOU MUST BE A SUBSCRIBER TO LISTEN TO ARKIVMUSIC STREAMING.
TRY IT NOW FOR FREE!
Sign up now for two weeks of free access to the world's best classical music collection. Keep listening for only $19.95/month - thousands of classical albums for the price of one! Learn more about ArkivMusic Streaming
Aleady a subscriber? Sign In