Notes and Editorial Reviews
As aspiring young soloists, no longer children, they experience intense competition, grueling practice sessions and professional setbacks, yet all these pianists have remained true to their art.
Ten years ago, the film "Russia’s Wonder Children" documented the struggles and triumphs of four extraordinary piano prodigies. Now, in "Competitors: Russia's Child Prodigies" the cameras return to discover how their lives and careers have developed, and whether time has brought the lasting success they all desired. As aspiring young soloists, no longer children, they experience
intense competition, grueling practice sessions and professional setbacks, yet all these pianists have remained true to their art. "You have to love the music, not yourself in the music," explains the youngest, Irina. "Or rather, the music in you."
Picture format: NTSC 16:9
Sound format: PCM Stereo / Dolby Digital 5.1 / DTS 5.1
Region code: 0 (worldwide)
Original language: Russian
Subtitles: English, German, French, Russian
Booklet notes: English, German, French, Russian
Running time: 98 mins
No. of DVDs: 1
Other works are heard in addition to the works listed below.
R E V I E W:
The cover blurb of this DVD instils a sense of incipient tension. One can even imagine the cinematic voice-over artist, gruff, guttural, theatrically ponderous in his delivery, as he says: ‘Ten years ago they were Stars; now they are Competitors’. The title seems, indeed, on reflection, to collude in the very humiliation to which some of these musicians are subjected during the course of the documentary film. The relish with which the combative is set up and asserted, the glee with which it is heralded on the cover, strikes me as not simply misplaced, but in some ways cruel.
Doubtless Irene Langemann would retort, as with the ‘Isherwood’ character in his Berlin stories, that she is just a camera, recording. Maybe. But it strikes a wrong note, one to which I draw attention at such length because I found one scene in the film distressing, and the remembrance of that scene – where one of the four musicians weeps after a humiliation at a Vienna piano competition – still sticks in my mind’s eye.
The film follows the lives and careers of four young pianists, of varying ages, all of whom were filmed a decade back in a similar film about prodigies, the 2000 documentary ‘Russia’s Wonder Children’. This has a socio-educational feel, analogous to BBC documentaries along similar though less specific lines, in which children are ‘followed’ from their early years to maturity, over five or ten year periods.
The film opens well; each musician plays in shadowy light, the same piece. All four pronounce themselves disgusted by their playing. The grins are genuine, the self-criticism quick and instinctive. There are a number of themes; finding a manager or agent; competitions; engagements; composing one’s own pieces; the balance of the sexes when it comes to concert pianists; the decision to marry and have children; the necessity to teach; the constant pressure of such a life; the hope that their careers will prove lasting and fulfilling.
All agree that competitiveness at the Moscow Conservatoire was inbuilt, pervasive and intense. And we watch them as they criss-cross Europe in search of competitions, big and small, at which to parade their wares. To win a competition, as we know, or at least spectacularly not to win a competition, ensures column inches of publicity, and that means eager managers. Irina Chistyakova is eventually voted off a smaller competition but her potential is spotted by a conductor who condemns the result vociferously. He’s only identified later as Enrique Batiz, and he invites her to Mexico to perform with his orchestra, a performance which we see. The serendipitous nature of this contact reinforces one’s view of competitions as a mixture of blind date and blood sport.
It is Elena Kolesnichenko whose visit to the Beethoven Competition in Vienna leads to such anguish. She feels she has never played better but is eliminated in the first round. It is ‘a racket’. Back in Hanover, where they live, her husband tries to console her as she weeps, and the camera lingers. Strangely, and soon, letters arrive from disgruntled jury members claiming they had voted for her, and that she was voted off so early because she was seen as too strong a competitor. The implication is clear. A judges’ favourite must win. It’s hardly a novelty in the competition circuit, but when one sees the human consequences, it condenses this objectionable practice.
The pervasive feelings that one draws from this film are the arbitrary nature of ‘success’, and the treadmill that leads young musicians toward it or ever further from it; the difficulties of life as a soloist with family commitments; the corrosive nature, but also the pleasures of, teaching; the crudeness of managers and agents in their milk-round of young talent. I must say, despite the successes that are duly welcomed, the film left me pretty pessimistic. And, in any case, if that’s what happens to young pianists, what chance old bald guys in their forties?
-- Jonathan Woolf, MusicWeb International
Works on This Recording
Be the first to review this title