Notes and Editorial Reviews
This is a hybrid Super Audio CD playable on both regular and Super Audio CD players.
This impressive recording sheds light on Schumann's role in the rediscovery of Bach's sacred music.
Ask people which of Johann Sebastian Bach's Passions they prefer, and probably 9 out of 10 will answer: the St Matthew. The St John Passion has always been in the shadow of its larger counterpart. In the Netherlands, where I live, there is a long-standing tradition of performing the St Matthew every year. No such tradition exists in regard to the St John Passion. In particular the large number of arias make the St Matthew Passion the most popular, and many also consider it the most dramatic, although that is highly
debatable. One could also argue that its more concise character and the relatively small number of arias make the St John Passion the more dramatic of the two. The difference in appreciation is not a phenomenon of our time. In the 19th century, when Bach's religious music was rediscovered, the difference in the appreciation of Bach's Passions was largely the same. The first performance of the St John Passion in the 19th century took place in Berlin in 1833, by the Berlin Singakademie, directed by Carl Friedrich Rungenhagen. The reception was rather lacklustre in comparison to the deep impression the first performance of the St Matthew Passion in 1826 made. The man responsible for this performance, Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, never paid any attention to the St John Passion.
Robert Schumann held a different opinion about the St John. Like many others he highly appreciated the St Matthew, but when he became acquainted with the St John - most likely by just studying the score - he was very impressed and from his writings one may conclude that he in fact preferred the smaller of Bach's two Passions. In 1849, in a letter to the director of music in Hamburg, Georg Dietrich Otten, he wrote: "But do you not also happen to find it much bolder, greater, and more poetic than the one based on the Gospel according to Matthew?" He considered the St Matthew Passion "not entirely free of lengthy passages, and indeed altogether much too long - whereas the other is as if pressed for time, though quite brilliant, especially in the chorus work, and what great art!".
While still in Dresden he started to perform choruses from the St John Passion in public performances of his own choir. When he moved to Düsseldorf, where he had been appointed director of music in 1850 he planned to perform the entire work. That wasn't easy: he faced the same problems Mendelssohn had to confront in his attempts to perform the St Matthew Passion. The main problem was the instrumentation: instruments like the lute and the viola d'amore were no longer in use and substitutes had to be employed. In addition a solution had to be found for the realisation of the basso continuo. He also had to find singers who were able to perform the solo parts. This in particular caused some sections to be omitted in the first performance which he conducted in 1851. Fortunately Schumann's conductor's score for this performance has been preserved. It contains much information about instrumentation, dynamics and articulation. But as some of his notes are rather rudimentary a modern performer has much work to do. Performers also have use their knowledge of Schumann's preferences regarding performance practice and of the aesthetic ideals of the time to create a convincing performance. Even so a modern realisation can never pretend to be a 'reconstruction' of Schumann's performance of 1851.
Although the booklet contains extensive programme notes it isn't always clear to what extent Schumann had 'arranged' Bach's score. Part of the problem is that some changes had to be made at the last moment because a particular singer was not available. The arias 'Mein teurer Heiland' and 'Zerfliesse mein Herze' were omitted in Schumann's performance. Here they are both performed. Unfortunately, though, the booklet doesn't make it totally clear as to what extent Schumann left notes as to what instruments he had prescribed. The programme notes are confusing about the aria 'Mein Jesu, ach!' - the text which replaced 'Erwäge' in Bach's fourth version of 1749. According to Thomas Synofzik this aria was elided from Schumann's performance, "probably mainly due to problems with the instrumentation". But in this performance it is sung. According to Hermann Max this aria was "eliminated on short notice from Schumann's performance". Do we have to conclude from this that Schumann wanted it to be performed and that he gave some indications in regard to its instrumentation? That remains a mystery.
It goes beyond the scope of this review to list all the changes Schumann made in comparison to the original. I'll just give some examples. As there was no tenor involved - apart from the interpreter of the Evangelist - the tenor solos are set for soprano. The basso continuo part is performed with piano, cello and double-bass. In the arioso 'Betrachte meine Seel' the part of the lute is given to clarinet and violas, whereas the two viola d'amore parts have to be played on muted violins. Although the aria 'Zerfließe mein Herze' was omitted by Schumann there are indications in his notes that he wanted the oboe da caccia part to be played on the basset horn - that is how it is performed here. The most drastic change comes in the instrumentation of the aria 'Es ist vollbracht'. In the slow section the part for viola da gamba is given to a viola, whereas the basso continuo is performed by viola and cello. In the fast section Schumann adds parts for two trumpets, underlining the triumphant character of the text. Trumpets in a Passion - that is probably too much to swallow for many modern listeners, even those who could live with all the other instrumentation changes.
It is not easy to perform an arrangement like this. In particular an ensemble which often performs baroque music - and will have performed Bach's St John Passion more than once - could easily play this work in too 'baroque' a fashion. Most of the turbae choruses, for instance, are sung at more or less the same speed and with the same flexibility as in baroque performances. I sometimes wondered whether the tempi were not too fast. On the other hand, the chorales are sung in a much more romantic fashion, for example in sometimes ignoring the fermatas at the end of the lines. The performance choices for the recitatives are interesting. For this interpretation Hermann Max used a book by Adolph Bernhard Marx (Die Kunst des Gesanges, 1826), whom Schumann admired. He "called for free treatment of the note values and rests in keeping with the rhetorical flow". Hermann Max rightly concludes that this reflects the practice of the baroque era. Therefore in this performance the recitatives are not that different from those adopted in 'authentic' performances of Bach's original score. The main difference is that no appogiaturas are sung, which was common practice in the baroque era.
There are also some deviations from the original in music and text. This is only referred to in the booklet but without further specification, as that would take too much space. There are changes which reflect the 'modernisation' of the German language - often the present tense is changed into past tense.
The key figure in any Passion performance is the Evangelist. This role is brilliantly sung by the German tenor Jan Kobow. His diction is impeccable, and he rightly adapts his articulation to follow the romantic performance model. The original soprano part is sung by Veronika Winter, who does so very well. Elisabeth Scholl sings the part which Bach gave to a tenor. Not only is this part technically demanding, its tessitura is rather high, and it is perhaps due to this fact that Schumann didn't have a tenor available to sing it. Ms Scholl does a marvellous job here, and her voice never sounds stressed, not even at the top notes. Gerhild Romberger gives a good account of the alto part, in particular in the first aria, 'Von den Stricken'. I am less happy with the other aria, 'Es ist vollbracht', where she uses too much vibrato. Clemens Heidrich is excellent in the role of Christ, and Ekkehard Abele is doing well in the arias and in the role of Pilate, although the lowest notes are a little weak sometimes. There are impressive performances of the choir and the orchestra whose contributions are crucial to this interpretation of Schumann's arrangement of Bach's masterpiece.
In the chorales the sopranos are supported by twenty trebles from the Kölner Domchor - the Choir of Cologne Cathedral. This is in line with Schumann's own performance, where fifty trebles were used. This is an indication that the vocal and instrumental forces he had at his disposal were larger than those Hermann Max uses, among them a choir of just 28 singers. Maybe the sound his ensembles produce isn't that much different from the sound of Schumann's forces. His performance took place in a concert hall, whereas this recording was made in what seems to be a pretty large church. The reverberation is often a problem, but here it works in a positive way, making the ensembles - and in particular the choir - sound larger than they are.
As I have already indicated the booklet contains extensive information about Schumann's treatment of Bach's score, and about the decisions which have been taken to realise this performance. It is a shame that the trebles of the Kölner Domchor are omitted from the list of performers. There is also no indication that this recording was made during live performances. If it was taken down live this would explain some minor technical imperfections and background noises.
This recording is testimony to Robert Schumann's appreciation of Bach's St John Passion. One can only be grateful that his role in the rediscovery of Bach's sacred music has been brought to our attention with this impressive recording.
-- Johan van Veen, MusicWeb International
Works on This Recording
Saint John Passion, BWV 245 by Johann Sebastian Bach
Elisabeth Scholl (Soprano),
Gerhild Romberger (Alto),
Veronika Winter (Soprano),
Jan Kobow (Tenor),
Ekkehard Abele (Bass),
Clemens Heidrich (Bass)
Das Kleine Konzert
Written: 1724; Leipzig, Germany
Venue: Knechtsteden Basilica, Germany
Length: 103 Minutes 24 Secs.
Notes: Arranger: Robert Schumann.
Knechtsteden Basilica, Germany (09/19/2006 - 09/21/2006)
Be the first to review this title